Jesus’ parable of the vineyards – about latecomers getting the same reward as early risers. And the one about the son who says No at first, but eventually does the will of his father, compared to the one who says Yes, then does not do the father’s will.
Both lead me to be thinking about how Jesus judges people. He clearly indicates that one way of thinking and acting is at least better than another way of thinking and acting. Jesus is judgmental, and these are a couple of MILD examples.
G.K. Chesteron
"Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions." Now THAT is something to think about in our postmodern, relativistic society. ( You need to read some of his writing - right up there with CSLewis and Dietrich Bonhoeffer.)
But how can we LIVE both Jesus’ love and acceptance of sinners and His condemnation of sin. Liberal Christians. Conservative Christians. Same Lord. Same Word. Way different emphasis.
Then there’s the total lack of tolerance for the conservative Christian perspectives that today’s proponents of tolerance continually display.
You’re with me so far, but now the twist: Is it possible that we conservative Christians are so focused on manifestations of depravity in our society (abortion, homosexuality, etc) and we work so diligently to address them politically and socially, that we let this focus define our faith for the world around us? Maybe, it would be better if we let it go a bit, and trust God to convict people in his own way and time, while we prioritize proclaiming His love and the hope and promise we have in Christ. Billy Graham and Luis Palau seem to be able to reflect and reveal the Lord in our postmodern age without getting nailed as right-wing, religious, intolerant fanatics. I wonder why. Perhaps it’s because they don’t let a few depravity issues define their faith. Or as the saying goes, they choose their battles differently.